Lenovo 82MJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82MJ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '22 at 22:20
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 74.1
1-Core 153
2-Core 274
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 855
85% 691 Pts
64-Core 1,065
66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Legend(17AA 3A5D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.10.30.01
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.7% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 49.7
50% 54.8 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 49.3
Splatting 43.3
41% 51.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-256G-1101 256GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21160001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 220 221 220 222 219 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,437
Write 899
Mixed 943
SusWrite 233
195% 878 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 59.3
223% 84.1 MB/s
DQ Read 675
DQ Write 757
DQ Mixed 573
471% 668 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 172%
Great: 179%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMS4WEC8C1K0446FCG Adata DDR4 3200 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.2% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 27.9
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 25.1
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82MJ Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82MJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback