Viglen DH55PJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics4.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemViglen DH55PJ  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DH55PJ
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '22 at 19:18
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Memory 4.84
1-Core 23.6
2-Core 56.9
13% 28.4 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 142
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI FirePro 3800 (FireGL) Graphics Adapter
AMD(1002 210A) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
4.17% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 4.7
4% 5.17 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.17%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 82 76 73 78 85 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.7% Below average
Read 156
Write 87.7
Mixed 161
SusWrite 80.1
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 16.2
67% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 31.6
DQ Write 69.1
DQ Mixed 36
32% 45.6 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
147GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 89 91 83 89 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 76.2
Write 82.3
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 88.8
54% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8JTF25664AZ-1G1D1 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 455
9% 455 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DH55PJ Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Viglen DH55PJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback