Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167 23,407 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Memory 74.9 1-Core 55.1 2-Core 106 50% 78.8 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 125 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 036D) 763MB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.36% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.36% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 1TB 1TB 2,981 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 857GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 195 162 152 66 31 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.4% Below average	Read 215 Write 171 Mixed 173 SusWrite 133 39% 173 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 29.4 4K Mixed 13.3 49% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 53.3 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 77.6 67% 96 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 1x2GB 220 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 4.7 15% 5.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 90.5 44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	21x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 5,297 samples	3x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 28%, 1,570 samples	2x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 26%, 802 samples	2x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $167

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16