Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	18.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211224
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 07 '22 at 14:52
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 3000G-$52 11,076 User benchmarks, average bench 53% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 70.1 1-Core 98.4 2-Core 173 65% 114 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 271 36% 271 Pts	64-Core 275 17% 275 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140 2,413 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Gigabyte(1458 2401); GV-R65XTGAMING OC-4GD Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.4.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62% Good	Lighting 68.8 Reflection 77.5 Parallax 130 56% 92 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 73.6 Splatting 82.6 74% 91.5 fps
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
128gb PCS 2.5" SSD 128GB 377 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 37 42 35 38 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 455 Write 102 Mixed 40 SusWrite 39.1 34% 159 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 32.9 4K Mixed 0.8 54% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 66.3 DQ Mixed 0.8 28% 69.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 617GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 173 173 173 171 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 117 Mixed 85.3 SusWrite 170 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 43GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 148 149 149 149 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	85% Excellent	Read 148 Write 146 Mixed 82.6 SusWrite 148 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 113%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 6GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.6 4.2 3.4 3.6 4 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	4.5% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 1.8 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 3.7 8% 7.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.5% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GF2X16QFHH36-135-K CM4X8GF2400Z16K4 24GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	67.6% Good	MC Read 25.9 MC Write 24.2 MC Mixed 21.8 68% 24 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 25.4 SC Mixed 22.1 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $140Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	829x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	791x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	751x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	781x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	449x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	419x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	352x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $56Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	184x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	260x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	198x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	146x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $407

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359