Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150 20,066 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	40% Average	Memory 65.7 1-Core 49.4 2-Core 43.8 38% 53 Pts	4-Core 86.3 8-Core 84.7 12% 85.5 Pts	64-Core 67.7 4% 67.7 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 054F) 2GB Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.64% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.77 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.64% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 266 339 345 357 330 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Write 345 Mixed 336 SusWrite 328 78% 337 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 34.2 4K Mixed 22 80% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 170 137% 195 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 6GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 11.2 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.1 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	21x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	18x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	11x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S13C9G 2x2GBKingstonBench 38%, 1,037 samples	4x
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 23%, 4,045 samples	3x
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	3x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $236

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16