HP p6-2017es

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6-2017es  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111021
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '22 at 19:05
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$186
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 170
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 429
44% 357 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530
Device(1B0A 90A3) 2GB
CLim: 699 MHz, MLim: 396 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6
Parallax 1.4
3% 3.77 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 225 234 229 167 100 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.4% Good
Read 215
Write 237
Mixed 217
SusWrite 195
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 34
100% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 122
113% 175 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2017es Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2017es

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback