Medion MS-7800

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion MS-7800  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7800
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '22 at 18:31
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 61.7
2-Core 101
50% 79.1 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 175
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
Asus(1043 8326) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.37% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 2.6
5% 5.3 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.37%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 08TH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 207 198 194 200 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 352
Write 184
Mixed 238
SusWrite 200
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 12.6
82% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 23.5
66% 139 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 69%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 8 7.7 8.4 8.1 8.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.71% Terrible
Read 24.8
Write 6.2
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 7.9
12% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.71%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 M378B5673EH1-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
33.2% Below average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.6
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7800 Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Medion MS-7800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback