Besstar UM340

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemBesstar UM340  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR UM340
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '22 at 16:40
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 65.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 206
68% 124 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 510
56% 441 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
8.81% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 17.1
9% 12.7 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 11.1
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.81%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-A01 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 282 288 298 320 319 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1281
Write 1,160
Mixed 1,112
SusWrite 332
217% 971 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 64.1
211% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 834
DQ Write 546
DQ Mixed 697
518% 692 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 168%
Great: 215%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (82nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 27
84% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 24.3
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UM340 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Besstar UM340

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback