Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	16.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq dc5750 Microtower (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0A64h
Memory	0.5 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070125
Uptime	15.9 Days
Run Date	May 06 '22 at 08:02
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ 4,133 User benchmarks, average bench 35% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Memory 35.1 1-Core 30 2-Core 58.5 25% 41.2 Pts	4-Core 55.4 8-Core 58.2 8% 56.8 Pts	64-Core 57.3 4% 57.3 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Lighting 17.3 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 18.3 14% 17.7 fps	MRender 15.5 Gravity 18.5 Splatting 16.8 14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 41 46 9.5 48 39 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16.7% Very poor	Read 131 Write 81.8 Mixed 74.1 SusWrite 36.2 18% 80.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 12.4 4K Mixed 10 26% 8.9 MB/s	DQ Read 13.3 DQ Write 22.2 DQ Mixed 13.7 12% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 85%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 33GB free Firmware: 3.CHF SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 48 17 52 42 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 62.1 Write 31.8 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 40 32% 42.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 42%
WD Purple Surveillance 1TB (2017)-$45 9,464 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 369GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 71 100 102 96 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 119 Write 118 Mixed 70.7 SusWrite 95.6 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 37GB 3,950 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 33792 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	6.46% Terrible	MC Read 1 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 0.9 5% 1.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 0.9 6% 2.27 GB/s	Latency 227 18% 227 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 6.46% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+AMDBench 36%, 5,372 samples	2x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+AMD $50Bench 34%, 2,970 samples	1x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+AMD $84Bench 34%, 2,640 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
GeForce GT 520NvidiaBench 2%, 16,336 samples	1x
GeForce 8500 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 4,580 samples	1x

SSD
750 EVO 120GBSamsung $35Bench 93%, 20,420 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples	1x

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $35

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16