Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 06 '22 at 04:30
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$355
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 70.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
85% 160 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 918
89% 729 Pts
64-Core 2,192
136% 2,192 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 874
Write 3,212
Mixed 618
357% 1,568 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 53
210% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,292
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 831
608% 823 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 472%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 114 116 115 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 144
Write 140
Mixed 81
SusWrite 115
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 88%
WD My Book 25ED 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 157 157 158 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 157
Mixed 114
SusWrite 158
202% 152 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 1.1
526% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 10.1
DQ Mixed 1.2
387% 4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.8% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 28
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 26.8
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback