Lenovo 81GC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 89% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81GC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '22 at 02:44
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 89%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 221
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 374
43% 337 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3802) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1259
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Lighting 31.2
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 31.1
25% 33.3 fps
MRender 34.2
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 20
23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 55 58 57 56 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,363
Write 911
Mixed 821
SusWrite 123
178% 805 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 74.4
273% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 656
DQ Mixed 220
245% 403 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 168%
Great: 209%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
213GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 441 428 415 412 355 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 436
Mixed 342
SusWrite 412
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 63.8
211% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 357
268% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 124%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD M471A1K43CB1-CTD 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.8% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 11.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81GC Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81GC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback