Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9500 APU (2016 D.BR) 2,296 User benchmarks, average bench 34% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Memory 92.1 1-Core 42.2 2-Core 106 52% 80.3 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 107 14% 107 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 13,858 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8719) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.20 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	7.72% Terrible	Lighting 9.5 Reflection 10.5 Parallax 13.3 8% 11.1 fps	MRender 7.9 Gravity 10.3 Splatting 9.7 8% 9.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.72% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900615 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 126 164 97 104 158 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Write 69.4 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 131 21% 90 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 21.5 70% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 81.7 DQ Mixed 158 110% 141 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CB4GU2666.C8GT 2x4GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 9.2 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 9.8 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16