Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '22 at 17:50
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 170
2-Core 338
108% 200 Pts
4-Core 670
8-Core 995
104% 832 Pts
64-Core 1172
72% 1172 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 109%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$301
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 136
Parallax 240
94% 163 fps
MRender 220
Gravity 122
Splatting 150
132% 164 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1060 816 816 815 817 816 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 2,441
Write 2,367
Mixed 1,715
SusWrite 857
413% 1845 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 82.1
270% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,102
DQ Write 1,389
DQ Mixed 1,174
906% 1,222 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 289%
Great: 355%
Kioxia-exceria SSD 500GB
255GB free
Firmware: ECFA12.b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1239 1066 894 591 619 492 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,101
Write 1,552
Mixed 1,229
SusWrite 817
266% 1,175 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 59
205% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1253
DQ Write 1,406
DQ Mixed 1,210
944% 1,290 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 216%
Great: 240%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$80
347GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 195 83 84 83 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 475
Mixed 434
SusWrite 166
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 52
177% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 373
281% 376 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 102%
Great: 128%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 73 72 72 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 180
Write 109
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 71.4
69% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
437GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 95 97 95 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 158
Write 93.9
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 95.7
69% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 108%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 64GB
50GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.1 4 4 3.4 4.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
6.94% Terrible
Read 32.1
Write 6.2
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 3.9
14% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.94%
Great: 9%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 4.9 4.8 5.4 4.8 5.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
5.98% Terrible
Read 27.1
Write 18.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.5
16% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.98%
Great: 6%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
29GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 7.1 7.1 6 5.8 7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
6.24% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 5.5
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 6.8
13% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.24%
Great: 21%
FCR-HS3 -3 32GB
29GB free, PID 6348
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.1 10 11 9.4 9.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 49.3
Write 3.5
Mixed 10
SusWrite 9.4
17% 18 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.7
102% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KF3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 38.3
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 31.7
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 40.1
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $739
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback