TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Biostar X470GTN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar X470GTN  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '22 at 16:15
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 217
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 452
59% 442 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 73.9%
 Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
MSI(1462 C75A)
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Lighting 96.6
Reflection 94.6
Parallax 87.6
79% 92.9 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 83.9
Splatting 75.4
73% 91.4 fps
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 76.7%
 Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 376 385 336 394 226 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 467
Mixed 392
SusWrite 351
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 42.8
144% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 284
233% 332 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 119%
Wilk GOODRAM 16GB
14GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 21 15 25 24 24 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 138
Write 25.1
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 19.7
46% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.3
121% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑
This bench: 29.8%
 Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 26.1
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 22.4
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 78%
 Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X470GTN Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Biostar X470GTN

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples8x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples5x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples3x
GPU
GeForce RTX 3060 TiNvidiaBench 127%, 6,258 samples6x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples4x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples3x
SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial  $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples5x
NVMe SSD 1TBNetacBench 315%, 2,454 samples5x
CS2130 1TB SSDPNYBench 181%, 3,107 samples3x
RAM
DDR4 8GB 3200MHz 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 35 samples6x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair  $102Bench 88%, 110,884 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback