Lenovo 20NE001GMX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20NE001GMX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20NE001GMX
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '22 at 14:05
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
25.2% Poor
Memory 29.7
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 110
37% 67.8 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 311
24% 211 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5124) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.40.06
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.11% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 3.6
2% 3 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.11%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GDHTNG-8710B 512GB
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80020C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 551 569 565 557 587 595 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 835
Write 656
Mixed 656
SusWrite 571
152% 679 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 34.7
123% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 521
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 441
330% 442 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 126%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3300ME78HBF-2666 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.4
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 256
16% 256 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20NE001GMX Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20NE001GMX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback