Lenovo 20T80005US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20T80005US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20T80005US
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210409
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateMay 04 '22 at 06:57
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 68.7
1-Core 136
2-Core 271
84% 159 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 704
78% 617 Pts
64-Core 728
45% 728 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 507F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 19.4
12% 15.5 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 16.9
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znt256g TOSHIBA MEMORY 256GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0109AELA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 92 39 39 48 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 750
Write 214
Mixed 223
SusWrite 66.8
68% 314 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 43.7
156% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 841
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 127
183% 362 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 218%
Seagate BUP Slim 1TB
112GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 33 32 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 30
Mixed 32
SusWrite 33.4
24% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.6
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 11.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20T80005US Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20T80005US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback