Intel X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardIntel X58  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '22 at 04:21
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 155
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 361
38% 306 Pts
64-Core 476
29% 476 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450
Sapphire(174B 3000) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 0.8
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BTO-1TB 985GB
869GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0519A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 228 224 237 221 241 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.6% Above average
Read 248
Write 207
Mixed 214
SusWrite 224
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 17.1
83% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 85.8
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 38
52% 93.1 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 85%
Netac OnlyDisk 32GB
16GB free, PID 2004
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 4.4 6.6 7.1 7.1 6.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 117
Write 11.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 6.7
28% 35 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GB
1600, 1600, 33 MHz
8192, 8192, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback