Corsair ONE a200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 203%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 232%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics206% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive464% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemCorsair ONE a200  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B550 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ax
Memory42.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '22 at 23:50
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 79.3
1-Core 173
2-Core 342
104% 198 Pts
4-Core 666
8-Core 1,298
116% 982 Pts
64-Core 2,222
138% 2,222 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
Palit(1569 2208) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
206% Outstanding
Lighting 302
Reflection 288
Parallax 318
246% 303 fps
MRender 335
Gravity 251
Splatting 188
203% 258 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 206%
Great: 225%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00A00 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7601Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3388 3397 3406 3406 2475 1640 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
464% Outstanding
Read 2,790
Write 3,358
Mixed 3,085
SusWrite 2,952
689% 3,046 MB/s
4K Read 80.8
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 113
375% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,417
DQ Write 1,062
DQ Mixed 1,205
910% 1,228 MB/s
Poor: 260%
This bench: 464%
Great: 511%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CM4S32GL3200K18K2 CM4S16GL3200K18K2 47GB
3200, 3200 MHz
32767, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.1% Very good
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 19.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 22.2
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ONE a200 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

System: Corsair ONE a200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback