Lenovo 20AWA15YLM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20AWA15YLM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20AWA15YLM
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200420
Uptime35.6 Days
Run DateMay 03 '22 at 21:44
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4910MQ-$110
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.1% Poor
Memory 48.4
1-Core 17.4
2-Core 29.5
23% 31.8 Pts
4-Core 46.5
8-Core 52.4
6% 49.5 Pts
64-Core 54.4
3% 54.4 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730M
Legend(17AA 221D) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
5.2% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 5.8
5% 7.03 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 6.4
5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.2%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 512GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 281 280 277 293 270 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 338
Write 285
Mixed 293
SusWrite 278
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 13.1
43% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 79.7
DQ Mixed 91.3
76% 111 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown S939A2SGS-ITR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
27% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 12
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.7
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20AWA15YLM Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20AWA15YLM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $264
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback