Asus VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop X407UAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop X407UAR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X407UAR
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '22 at 06:04
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
48% Average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 95.9
46% 72 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 165
20% 156 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 12B1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.7
5% 5.03 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 6
Splatting 10
6% 6.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 240 256 247 221 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 261
Write 374
Mixed 320
SusWrite 237
68% 298 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 26.8
84% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 292
200% 245 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FR 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.8
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop X407UAR Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop X407UAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback