| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Notebook W65_67SJ (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Notebook W65_67SJ |
| Memory | 2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140825 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 02 '22 at 16:56 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 37% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.8%
Good
|
64% 106 Pts
|
29% 222 Pts
|
14% 228 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 6501) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3412
|
3.41%
Terrible
|
4% 8.47 fps
|
3% 3.67 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 73 80 79 76 77 MB/s
|
41%
Average
|
24% 108 MB/s
|
83% 32.3 MB/s
|
66% 92.5 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
94GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 29 19 23 20 MB/s
|
31.6%
Below average
|
56% 54.3 MB/s
|
133% 3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5428-061.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
32.3%
Below average
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
58% 69.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical W65_67SJ Builds (Compare 101 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Notebook W65_67SJ
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4710MQIntel $44Bench 60%, 15,557 samples | 33x |
| Core i7-4810MQIntel $400Bench 62%, 26,927 samples | 23x |
| Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples | 14x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples | 55x |
| GTX 850MNvidiaBench 14%, 13,931 samples | 45x |
| HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $80 |