Notebook W65_67SJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNotebook W65_67SJ  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_67SJ
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '22 at 16:23
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 150
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 236
32% 237 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
Clevo(1558 6501) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 15.9
14% 16.4 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 15.4
14% 16.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 80 83 78 79 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 131
Write 97.6
Mixed 120
SusWrite 77.4
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 29.4
121% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 85
DQ Mixed 4.6
30% 69.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 73%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
94GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 15 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 17.2
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 16.1
23% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.4
123% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-061.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
32.8% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65_67SJ Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_67SJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback