Toshiba Satellite L700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite L700  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory2 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110322
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 02 '22 at 09:18
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B980
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 118
55% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 125
17% 124 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M
Toshiba(1179 FCD0) 1GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
1.99% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 0.8
2% 2.63 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 0.6
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.99%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bulldozer-480GB 480GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 195 6.1 144 4.8 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 339
Write 254
Mixed 270
SusWrite 73.2
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 13.3
78% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 6
DQ Mixed 0.4
4% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673EH1-CF8 GU672203EP0200 3GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L700 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback