Medion MD34100/2544

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMedion MD34100/2544  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B360H4-EM
Memory5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateMay 02 '22 at 06:44
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 237
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 680
72% 577 Pts
64-Core 687
42% 687 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37AA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3566 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
164% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 211
Parallax 258
184% 232 fps
MRender 259
Gravity 226
Splatting 162
171% 216 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 164%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKF180G8L 180GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHFL05P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 265 188 191 144 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 376
Mixed 388
SusWrite 216
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 48.1
160% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 247
199% 280 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 96%
Great: 101%
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB
698GB free
Firmware: 17.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 138 137 140 180 164 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 17.4
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 19.5
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34100/2544 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Medion MD34100/2544

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback