HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150407
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 21:00
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820QM-$275
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 192
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 470
54% 419 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M3000M
HP(103C 176C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1185 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 42
Parallax 36
28% 37.4 fps
MRender 48.2
Gravity 35.4
Splatting 43.5
35% 42.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 386 368 369 370 373 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 428
Mixed 399
SusWrite 378
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 37
120% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 366
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 129%
Toshiba HDWL120 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: JT000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 112 114 115 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 116
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 113
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.6
223% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63.6% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 21.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback