MSI AM1I (MS-7865)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7865
MotherboardMSI AM1I (MS-7865)  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 17:51
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5350 APU R3
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 60.4
1-Core 31.8
2-Core 64.2
35% 52.1 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 129
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
MSI(1462 7865) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.89% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.83 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.7
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.89%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 760 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 322 334 347 343 369 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 353
Write 352
Mixed 330
SusWrite 338
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 32.6
106% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 175
132% 177 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 88%
ADATA SU760 256GB
69GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 224 234 238 231 247 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
140% Outstanding
Read 222
Write 216
Mixed 207
SusWrite 232
300% 219 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 15.9
1,189% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.2
DQ Write 22.6
DQ Mixed 19.7
1,506% 20.2 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS2G3D1609DS1S00. BLS2G3D1609DS1S00. 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.1% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 7.6
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1I (MS-7865) Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI AM1I (MS-7865)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback