MSI B450M MORTAR (MS-7B89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B89
MotherboardMSI B450M MORTAR (MS-7B89)  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 17:02
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 155
2-Core 307
98% 182 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 897
91% 736 Pts
64-Core 1,151
71% 1,151 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2122 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Lighting 70.5
Reflection 72.2
Parallax 66.5
58% 69.7 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 72.9
Splatting 67.9
58% 70.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1479
Write 2,026
Mixed 1,496
374% 1,667 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 79.8
274% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,184
DQ Write 1,011
DQ Mixed 514
544% 903 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 291%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
39GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 340 321 320 320 319 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 460
Mixed 430
SusWrite 330
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 44.3
146% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 366
250% 307 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 129%
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30
71GB free
Firmware: P1021A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 305 304 304 305 306 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 338
Mixed 373
SusWrite 306
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 38.1
147% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 155
138% 200 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.5% Very good
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 30.5
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 29.6
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M MORTAR (MS-7B89) Builds (Compare 977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450M MORTAR (MS-7B89) - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $634
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback