Gigabyte GA-AERO 15 Classic-XA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 15 Classic-XA  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 15:49
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User EUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 658
68% 548 Pts
64-Core 857
53% 857 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 1664) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 10
Parallax 8.7
5% 8.33 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 11.5
8% 9.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Gigabyte(1458 1664) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.2% Very good
Lighting 88.5
Reflection 98.5
Parallax 98.2
72% 95.1 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 91.9
Splatting 86.7
84% 106 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 768 551 555 225 500 551 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 2,267
Write 1,407
Mixed 1,205
SusWrite 525
299% 1,351 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 76.3
246% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,127
DQ Write 625
DQ Mixed 1,050
734% 934 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 239%
Great: 293%
WDC WDS200T2B0B-00YS70 2TB
639GB free
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 464 325 333 474 467 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 476
Mixed 359
SusWrite 420
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 40
143% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 219
197% 301 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 105%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
76.9% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 21.6
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 22.8
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AERO 15 Classic-XA Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 15 Classic-XA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 617% - Outstanding Total price: $4
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback