Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII DARK HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII DARK HERO  (all builds)
Memory18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 14:20
Run Duration369 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.45 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 76.7
1-Core 160
2-Core 317
98% 185 Pts
4-Core 632
8-Core 1,272
112% 952 Pts
64-Core 2336
145% 2336 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
PowerColor(148C 2408) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.4.2
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 239
Reflection 242
Parallax 512
195% 331 fps
Gravity 208
Splatting 277
220% 243 fps
Poor: 177% Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid ADATA SX8100NP 1TB
706GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 761 719 748 728 806 740 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1289
Write 1388
Mixed 803
SusWrite 750
237% 1,058 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 28
91% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 300
223% 293 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 139%
Great: 215%
WD Blue SN500 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$37
92GB free
Firmware: 201000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 843 674 650 735 735 743 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 900
Mixed 764
SusWrite 730
163% 714 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 56
184% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 636
DQ Write 580
DQ Mixed 605
455% 607 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 147%
Great: 228%
Amd-raid WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
60GB free
Firmware: 4010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 311 320 321 183 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 403
Write 242
Mixed 327
SusWrite 257
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 17.7
62% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 97.4
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 116
94% 131 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 69%
Amd-raid ST4000DM004-2CV1 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 138 133 150 151 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 48
Write 102
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 140
55% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
30% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 104%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA DT01ACA1 1TB
263GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 127 122 137 137 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 129
Write 110
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 127
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 110%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA DT01ABA1 1TB
401GB free
Firmware: MU2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 128 131 131 131 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
70% Good
Read 115
Write 92.7
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 129
68% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory 4133 C19 Series 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 48.7
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 27.7
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 24.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VIII DARK HERO Builds (Compare 3,962 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII DARK HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,659
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback