Asrock N68-S3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock N68-S3 FX  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '22 at 13:01
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 125
58% 92.4 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 242
33% 245 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
XFX(1682 3063) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.31% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 6.6
6% 8.07 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8.2
6% 7.77 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.31%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvidia STRIPE 596.20G 640GB
535GB free (System drive)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 279
Write 294
Mixed 99.6
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 1.7
9% 4.23 MB/s
DQ Read 3.9
DQ Write 12.7
DQ Mixed 5.1
5% 7.23 MB/s
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
11GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 9.1 9.1 9.1 8.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
9.96% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 6
Mixed 8.1
SusWrite 8.9
12% 9.68 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2
135% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.96%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-S3 FX Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-S3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $101
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback