Asus Z97-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics94.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-P  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '22 at 12:50
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 127
2-Core 256
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 522
70% 523 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.6% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 135
Parallax 123
97% 126 fps
MRender 93.1
Gravity 123
Splatting 112
90% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 240GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 162 81 91 51 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
47% Average
Read 465
Write 398
Mixed 393
SusWrite 115
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 1.2
42% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 42.4
83% 167 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47%
Great: 94%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
2TB free
Firmware: ML6OAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 101 101 100 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 82.6
Write 92.8
Mixed 57
SusWrite 101
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 0215 CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB
1632, 1632, 1632, 1632 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.7% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 20.5
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 20.8
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-P Builds (Compare 2,977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-P - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $758
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback