Hp-pavilion BK544AV-ABA 600-1150qd

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHp-pavilion BK544AV-ABA 600-1150qd  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON E66
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100401
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 29 '22 at 22:56
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 86.6
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 95.9
52% 78.1 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 198
22% 175 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 230
Device(1B0A 903B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.18% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.1
2% 2 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.5
2% 3.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.18%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 211 213 217 216 218 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.3% Above average
Read 204
Write 224
Mixed 213
SusWrite 216
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 29
93% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 134
118% 177 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16JSF25664HZ-1G4F1 CE8 M471B5273BH1-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.8% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 9.3
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BK544AV-ABA 600-1150qd Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion BK544AV-ABA 600-1150qd

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback