Asus G75VW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemAsus G75VW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G75VW
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121106
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateApr 29 '22 at 18:04
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 86.4
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 168
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 193
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670M
Asus(1043 2119) 3GB
CLim: 620 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.64% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.7 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 1.64%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 240GB-$232
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 106 135 138 136 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 124
Write 203
Mixed 166
SusWrite 132
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 24
86% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 89.2
94% 155 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 67%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
325GB free
Firmware: SM12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 86 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 86.1
Write 91.4
Mixed 62
SusWrite 86.5
60% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G75VW Builds (Compare 622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G75VW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback