Acer Predator PO9-900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PO9-900  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO9-900
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 29 '22 at 16:20
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$993
CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 236
77% 142 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 808
72% 610 Pts
64-Core 2,488
154% 2,488 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 512.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (97 fps cap detected)
79.1% Very good
Lighting 96.8
Reflection 96.9
Parallax 96.9
79% 96.9 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 96.9
Splatting 96.9
79% 96.9 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$198
950GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1240 1234 1158 1241 1092 1217 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 2,076
Write 1,677
Mixed 1,297
SusWrite 1197
349% 1,562 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 42
141% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 678
DQ Write 92.7
DQ Mixed 182
185% 318 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 217%
Great: 371%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
137GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1497 1396 1345 1337 1399 1317 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,190
Write 1,811
Mixed 1,495
SusWrite 1382
385% 1,720 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 51.3
166% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 877
DQ Write 81.3
DQ Mixed 160
198% 373 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 245%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9D8MH-16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 59
MC Mixed 39.3
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 9.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PO9-900 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO9-900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback