Asus PRIME H310M-D R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-D R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '22 at 10:42
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$218
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 289
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,011
96% 794 Pts
64-Core 1,010
62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1287) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 7.7
5% 6.17 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 7.1
5% 6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 235 216 239 193 220 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 281
Write 305
Mixed 244
SusWrite 229
60% 265 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 22.6
76% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 69.8
DQ Write 82.7
DQ Mixed 54.9
47% 69.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 65%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
494GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 138 141 142 130 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 2
Write 61.4
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 128
36% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0
24% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 107%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
276GB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 33.9
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 34.3
44% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-D R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-D R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback