HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics77.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '22 at 07:13
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 142
58% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 638
54% 462 Pts
64-Core 2,468
153% 2,468 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.2% Very good
Lighting 97.5
Reflection 106
Parallax 149
80% 118 fps
MRender 88.8
Gravity 107
Splatting 76
73% 90.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1422 1423 1340 1297 1310 1232 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,836
Write 1,367
Mixed 734
SusWrite 1,337
294% 1,318 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 50
163% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 527
DQ Write 384
DQ Mixed 413
320% 442 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 226%
Great: 283%
Hitachi HUS72302CLAR2000 2TB
736GB free
Firmware: C1D8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 139
Write 41
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 40.8
50% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HUS724030ALS640 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: A280
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 166 170 167 166 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 157
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 168
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Hitachi HUS724030ALS640 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: A152
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 170 172 173 172 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 166
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 170
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 105%
Ibm-xiv ST2000NM0001 A2 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: BC42
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 126 126 128 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 123
Write 43.5
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 126
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 89%
WD Elements 500GB
466GB free, PID 10a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 100 46 60 84 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 85
Write 82.4
Mixed 31
SusWrite 67.6
87% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 16x4GB
16 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 31.8
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback