HP Pavilion All-in-One 24-r0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion All-in-One 24-r0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8449
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '22 at 01:50
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 214
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 520
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 8449) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 17.3
0% 9.9 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 12
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA1-8D128-HP 128GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A182
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 153 123 113 129 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 712
Write 266
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 134
62% 287 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 51.6
106% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 497
DQ Write 424
DQ Mixed 238
239% 386 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 337%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3E2 TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.9% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 26
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 21.7
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion All-in-One 24-r0xx Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion All-in-One 24-r0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback