HP ProLiant DL180 Gen9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProLiant DL180 Gen9  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory77.6 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150506
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateApr 28 '22 at 19:52
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User SLV-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 37.4
2-Core 145
49% 84.5 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 446
40% 337 Pts
64-Core 1,042
64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 300GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 142 146 147 143 143 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 91%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 2TB
383GB free
Firmware: 2.52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1046 831 856 808 795 716 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 107%
ST2000DX 002-2DV164 2TB
801GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 116 125 129 122 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 150
Write 143
Mixed 81
SusWrite 124
165% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.5
248% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 752369-081 16x16GB
16 of 16 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
103% Outstanding
MC Read 48.1
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 40.6
119% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 16.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback