Tarox Entry Tower Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTarox Entry Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3644-B1
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200804
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateApr 28 '22 at 18:13
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2134
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 232
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 617
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 632
39% 632 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 75%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2200
Nvidia(10DE 131B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1746 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 462.96
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47% Average
Lighting 53.9
Reflection 67
Parallax 57.8
44% 59.6 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 57.6
Splatting 65.7
53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,280
Write 886
Mixed 933
229% 1,033 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 54.2
205% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 663
DQ Write 749
DQ Mixed 561
463% 658 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 199%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
855GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 179 179 180 180 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 152
Mixed 88.1
SusWrite 180
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFRA32A.M4FE 859B CT8G4DFRA32A.C8FP 859B CT8G4DFRA32A.M4FE 859B CT8G4DFRA32A.M4FE 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.9% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.8
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Entry Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Tarox Entry Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $809
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback