Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '22 at 16:18
Run Duration339 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$55
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 124
58% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 292
32% 256 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 28.2
Parallax 35.4
27% 32.1 fps
MRender 34.7
Gravity 36
Splatting 26.1
26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 130 130 111 101 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 480
Write 151
Mixed 139
SusWrite 127
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 31.5
124% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 99.4
DQ Mixed 7.9
52% 126 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 128%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
211GB free
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 49 53 50 51 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 420
Write 272
Mixed 315
SusWrite 77.4
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 25.3
108% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 159
140% 208 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 163 169 169 162 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 79.1
Write 137
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 162
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
231% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 113
Write 75.2
Mixed 85.2
68% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
10GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 175 177 176 177 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 113
Write 64.7
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 175
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 101%
WD WD10 1EDAZ-11Y7KA0 10TB
69GB free
Firmware: 81.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 84 85 85 86 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.3% Very good
Read 180
Write 192
Mixed 98.6
SusWrite 84.4
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.2
315% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
4GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 76.2
Write 103
Mixed 55
58% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.5
158% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
604GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 86 85 84 85 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 116
Write 82.5
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 84
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
9GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 85 85 85 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 58.1
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 84.4
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
14GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 83 83 84 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 182
Write 141
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 83.1
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 114%
ASMT 2115 500GB
136GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 221 220 223 227 229 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 223
Write 201
Mixed 211
SusWrite 220
291% 214 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 21.2
1,612% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 32.2
DQ Mixed 25.8
2,054% 26.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 159%
Great: 166%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 15.7
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 13.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback