PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P (all builds) |
Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160226 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 28 '22 at 16:18 |
Run Duration | 339 Seconds |
Run User | AUT-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 130 130 111 101 109 MB/s
|
73.1%
Very good
|
|||
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
211GB free
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 49 53 50 51 51 MB/s
|
64.4%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 163 169 169 162 162 MB/s
|
69.7%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
10GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 175 177 176 177 177 MB/s
|
82.8%
Excellent
|
|||
WD WD10 1EDAZ-11Y7KA0 10TB
69GB free
Firmware: 81.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 84 85 85 86 MB/s
|
76.3%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
604GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 86 85 84 85 86 MB/s
|
57.5%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
9GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 85 85 85 86 MB/s
|
53.1%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
14GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 83 83 84 85 MB/s
|
75.9%
Very good
|
|||
ASMT 2115 500GB
136GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 221 220 223 227 229 MB/s
|
159%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
|
45%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 951x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 861x |
FX-8320AMD $75Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 399x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 283x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 181x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 162x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $366 |