Packard EasyNote TH36

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPackard EasyNote TH36  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EasyNote TH36
Memory2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '22 at 13:19
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4500
uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 36.7
2-Core 71.6
39% 58.9 Pts
4-Core 72.2
8-Core 72.2
10% 72.2 Pts
64-Core 72.2
4% 72.2 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 0459)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.38% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.47 fps
MRender 0.4
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.38%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHV2080BH 79GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0085
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 6.9 13 17 13 5.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Read 6.2
Write 8.8
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 10.1
6% 8.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TH36 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Packard EasyNote TH36

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback