Skikk Midgard 17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSkikk Midgard 17  (all builds)
MotherboardSKIKK.EU MIDGARD 17 - RTX 3050
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '22 at 12:23
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 81.6
1-Core 160
2-Core 325
100% 189 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 876
92% 738 Pts
64-Core 1013
63% 1013 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Device(1D05 1140) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1215
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.5% Above average
Lighting 77.3
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 67.5
63% 73.5 fps
MRender 72.7
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 54.2
50% 62 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1957 1890 1959 915 273 287 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 1,505
Write 2,010
Mixed 1,632
SusWrite 1,214
360% 1,590 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 87
295% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,362
DQ Write 987
DQ Mixed 1,105
844% 1,151 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 278%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-16GRS 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 12.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Midgard 17 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

System: Skikk Midgard 17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $492Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback