HCL ME LAPTOP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHCL ME LAPTOP  (all builds)
MotherboardHCL HCL Infosystems Limited
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '22 at 11:11
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 131
57% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 185
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 48.2
3% 48.2 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Device(1B0A 2080) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 44 45 32 61 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 394
Write 265
Mixed 182
SusWrite 68
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 13.3
50% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 85
DQ Mixed 30
42% 77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 55%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
275GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 76 80 79 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 135
Write 92.5
Mixed 64
SusWrite 77.9
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
178% 2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
V01L3SF4GB26826813 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ME LAPTOP Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HCL ME LAPTOP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback