Toshiba SATELLITE C660

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C660 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PWWAA
Memory	2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110517
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '22 at 11:05
Run Duration	109 Seconds
Run User	KWT-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	Memory 34.5 1-Core 30 2-Core 53 24% 39.2 Pts	4-Core 76.2 8-Core 77 10% 76.6 Pts	64-Core 76 5% 76 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FD3C) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.56% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 0.9 0% 0.93 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.9 1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.56% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 280GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 55 59 57 62 58 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 64 Write 63.3 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 58.3 42% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5773CHS-CH9 80AD HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 6 15% 5.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 230 17% 230 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C660 Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C660

CPU
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples	120x
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	75x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	73x

GPU
GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples	174x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	168x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	71x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	53x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	43x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16