TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

CCL Kallis Ryzen 7X AMD Motherboard Bundle

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCCL Kallis Ryzen 7X AMD Motherboard Bundle  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS ELITE
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220217
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateApr 27 '22 at 21:31
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 74.9
1-Core 125
2-Core 244
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 851
81% 670 Pts
64-Core 1,268
78% 1,268 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 83%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Gigabyte(1458 37D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.4% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 113
Parallax 113
94% 114 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 103
Splatting 95.6
90% 112 fps
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 92.4%
 Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 296
Mixed 247
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 34.7
130% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 35.7
74% 153 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
190GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 174 178 180 177 179 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 99.7
Write 109
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 172
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 77.8%
 Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.9% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 25.2
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 25.5
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 75.9%
 Great: 108%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Kallis Ryzen 7X AMD Motherboard Bundle Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

System: CCL Kallis Ryzen 7X AMD Motherboard Bundle

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples6x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD  $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples1x
GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia  $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples3x
GTX 980-TiNvidia  $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples1x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples1x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples2x
CS900 120GBPNY  $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples1x
NVMe LITEON 256GBCx2-8b256-q11Bench 168%, 2,143 samples1x
RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples4x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GBUnknownBench 87%, 50 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $563
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback