Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D2550 408 User benchmarks, average bench 25% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Memory 41.2 1-Core 7.2 2-Core 13.4 17% 20.6 Pts	4-Core 20.2 8-Core 22 3% 21.1 Pts	64-Core 23.1 1% 23.1 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 610M 4,874 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8536) 512MB CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 376.54 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	1.7% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 0.6 2% 1.37 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.7% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3500102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 155 154 149 151 153 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.7% Below average	Read 197 Write 154 Mixed 166 SusWrite 151 38% 167 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 17.5 4K Mixed 12 43% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 84 DQ Write 65 DQ Mixed 68.4 53% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5469-014.A00L 2x2GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.77 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 14%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Atom D2550IntelBench 25%, 408 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 610MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,874 samples	2x

SSD
PLUS 1000GBSandiskBench 44%, 44,528 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	1x
99U5469-014.A00L 2x2GBKingstonBench 13%, 5 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16