Intel X79

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200529
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '22 at 15:26
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 78.4 1-Core 78.9 2-Core 163 62% 107 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 518 47% 397 Pts	64-Core 763 47% 763 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.3.1 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	47.9% Average	Lighting 60.3 Reflection 60 Parallax 82.3 49% 67.5 fps	MRender 60.8 Gravity 66.4 Splatting 44.3 46% 57.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sn520 SDAPNUW-128G-1004 128GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20300004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 216 216 216 215 216 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 812 Write 671 Mixed 519 SusWrite 224 124% 557 MB/s	4K Read 36.7 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 50.2 163% 56 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 275 206% 271 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 143%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 120GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 94 93 93 93 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 77.7 Write 74.1 Mixed 57.1 SusWrite 92.8 56% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 65GB free Firmware: JP2OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 110 115 115 115 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 121 Write 117 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 114 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C HMT351R7BFR4A HMT151R7TFR4C HMT351R7BFR4A 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 14.9 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 10 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 83.6 48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	339x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	272x
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples	145x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	126x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	115x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	110x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	66x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	45x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	36x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	127x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	64x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16