Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P9300 266 User benchmarks, average bench 37% IC1050, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Memory 39.7 1-Core 35.3 2-Core 62.7 28% 45.9 Pts	4-Core 62.4 8-Core 65.2 8% 63.8 Pts	64-Core 64.8 4% 64.8 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Toshiba(1179 000E) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.36% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 0.4 0% 0.47 fps	MRender 0.5 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 0.9 0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.36% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS723220L9A360 200GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: FC3OC30F SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 57 46 62 19 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 36.6 Write 33 Mixed 14.6 SusWrite 43.2 23% 31.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 98% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 4.6 14% 5.03 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.4 14% 4.8 GB/s	Latency 204 20% 204 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core2 Duo P9400IntelBench 38%, 748 samples	1x
Core2 Duo P9300IntelBench 37%, 266 samples	1x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	1x
Quadro NVS 150MNvidiaBench 1%, 153 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16