Apple iMac15,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemApple iMac15,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-FA842E06C61E91C5
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '17 at 23:57
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 249
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 658
65% 530 Pts
64-Core 657
41% 657 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M295X (Bootcamp XG edition by bootcampdrivers.com)
Apple(106B 013A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.677.1
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
7.89% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 14.6
8% 12 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 8.39
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 7.89%
Great: 30%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD ST3000DM001 3TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 159
Write 148
Mixed 142
113% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.15
61% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x31364B544631473634485A2D314736453220 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.5
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac15,1 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Apple iMac15,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback