Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '22 at 21:47
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 67
1-Core 102
2-Core 155
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 253
36% 267 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 4.6
3% 3.33 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 87 25 33 35 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 431
Write 380
Mixed 336
SusWrite 93.7
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 9
54% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 93%
Kingston DataTraveler 160 32GB
5GB free, PID 1646
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 8.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
7.11% Terrible
Read 23.2
Write 12
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 9.4
17% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.11%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 99U5584-010.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.2
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $56

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback